Key takeaways
- Buffer’s 2.5 million-post study (Feb 2026) found Thursday 9 a.m., Wednesday 12 p.m. and Wednesday 9 a.m. strongest, with weekday mornings 6–11 a.m. the best block.
- Evenings (6–11 p.m.) and weekends — Saturday lowest — had the lowest engagement in Buffer’s data.
- Sprout Social’s study does not cover Threads and Buffer’s frequency guide has no Threads figure, so there is no second study or published frequency benchmark to check against.
- Threads has its own scheduler for posts up to 75 days ahead (replies cannot be scheduled).
What's the best Threads posting schedule, according to published research?
Each row is one published analysis, read from its own page on 2026-09-23. They measure different samples over different periods, so they are listed side by side rather than merged into one number.
| Source | Sample | What it reported |
|---|---|---|
| Buffer (published 4 Feb 2026) | 2.5 million posts sent through Buffer; median engagement by hour and day | Best slots: Thursday 9 a.m., Wednesday 12 p.m., Wednesday 9 a.m.; weekday mornings 6–11 a.m. the best block. Best days: Wednesday, Thursday, Tuesday. Weakest: evenings 6–11 p.m. and weekends, Saturday lowest. |
| Sprout Social (31 Mar 2026) | Not covered | Sprout Social’s 2026 best-times study does not include Threads. |
Do the studies agree, and how much should you trust them?
With one large study there is nothing to cross-check it against, so weigh it accordingly. Its pattern — midweek mornings strong, weekends and evenings weak — resembles Buffer’s findings for Instagram and Facebook, which is unsurprising but not independent confirmation.
Both large studies express times as the audience’s local time: Sprout Social records every time in local time (a 9 a.m. window is 9 a.m. in Los Angeles, London and Sydney alike), and Buffer says to “consider all the recommendations local time”. If your audience is spread across time zones, schedule for the zone where most of your followers are.
Every figure here is an aggregate across many accounts and industries. It tells you where to start testing, not when your audience is online.
How often should you post on Threads?
We did not find a large published frequency benchmark for Threads: neither Buffer’s roundup nor HeyOrca’s survey includes one. Threads is a text-first, conversational feed, so a workable starting point is a cadence you can sustain while replying to comments — but that is our judgement, not a measured finding.
| Source | Recommendation | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Buffer frequency guide (13 Jan 2026) | No Threads figure | The guide covers Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, X, LinkedIn, Pinterest and YouTube but not Threads |
| HeyOrca survey (20 Feb 2026) | No Threads figure | The survey reports Instagram, Facebook, LinkedIn and TikTok only |
Can you schedule Threads posts natively, and what does SkedCast add?
Threads has built-in scheduling: when Meta launched it in January 2025 it allowed posts up to 75 days ahead, several a day, but not replies. Posts are scheduled one at a time from the composer.
Threads posts through SkedCast follow the same rules as the composer: up to 500 characters, with text-only posts allowed.
SkedCast holds a scheduled post and publishes it at the time you set, from one calendar shared with every other connected account, with the same per-platform limits checked when you schedule rather than at publish time. Scheduling never changes when your audience is online; it only makes sure the post goes out in the window you chose.
- Threads posts can be text-only (up to 500 characters), or carry up to 20 images as a carousel, or one video.
- Only one hashtag per Threads post is linked as a topic; extra hashtags are plain text.
- Threads has no scheduling field in its publishing API, so SkedCast holds the post and publishes it at the set time.
How do you find your own best time to post on Threads?
A study average is a starting hypothesis. Your account’s own results are the evidence. A simple test:
- Pick two or three candidate windows from the studies above (for example a weekday morning, a weekday afternoon and an evening) rather than one “best” hour.
- Post the same kinds of content into each window for at least three or four weeks, so one viral post cannot decide the result.
- Compare each window on median engagement rate (engagements divided by reach or followers), not raw likes, so a bigger post does not win by size alone.
- Keep the winner, keep testing one challenger, and re-check every quarter: audiences and platform behaviour drift.
Where does SkedCast’s best-times feature fit?
SkedCast’s best-times feature does the “find your own window” step for you where the data exists: a daily job reads each connected account’s own publish history and the engagement analytics SkedCast has ingested for it, and recommends the day-and-hour slots where that account’s posts did best, in the account’s own time zone. It never invents a slot — an account with no analytics data yet simply has none — and how much it can derive depends on what each platform exposes to third-party apps. The same slots are available through the API (GET /v1/best-times, scope besttimes.read) and the MCP get_best_times tool. Best times is included from the Solo plan.
Sources
- Buffer — Best Time to Post on Social Media in 2026 (52M posts, 10 platforms)
- Sprout Social — Best Times to Post on Social Media 2026 (~2B engagements, ~307K profiles)
- Buffer — The Best Time to Post on Threads (2.5M posts)
- Buffer — How Often to Post on Social Media in 2026
- HeyOrca — Optimal social media posting frequency by platform (2026 manager survey)
- MacRumors — Threads now lets you schedule posts up to 75 days in advance
FAQ
- What is the best time to post on Threads?
- There is no single best time. Buffer’s 2.5 million-post study (Feb 2026) found Thursday 9 a.m., Wednesday 12 p.m. and Wednesday 9 a.m. strongest, with weekday mornings 6–11 a.m. the best block. Treat published averages as a starting point and test windows against your own audience.
- How often should you post on Threads?
- We did not find a large published frequency benchmark for Threads: neither Buffer’s roundup nor HeyOrca’s survey includes one. Threads is a text-first, conversational feed, so a workable starting point is a cadence you can sustain while replying to comments — but that is our judgement, not a measured finding.
- Does Threads have built-in scheduling?
- Threads has built-in scheduling: when Meta launched it in January 2025 it allowed posts up to 75 days ahead, several a day, but not replies. Posts are scheduled one at a time from the composer.
- Can SkedCast pick the best time to post on Threads for me?
- It recommends day-and-hour slots per connected account from that account’s own publish history and the engagement analytics SkedCast has ingested, refreshed daily. It does not invent a slot when there is no data yet, and how much it can derive depends on what the platform exposes to third-party apps.
- Is there enough data to say when to post on Threads?
- One large study exists — Buffer’s 2.5 million-post analysis — and Sprout Social’s study does not cover Threads. It is a reasonable starting point, but there is no second study to confirm it.
- Can you schedule replies on Threads?
- Not with Threads’ built-in scheduler: when it launched, Meta’s scheduling covered posts up to 75 days ahead but not replies.